<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friendfeed is for Early Adopters. Why? Because Nobody Else Needs It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/</link>
	<description>Opinionated Web 2.0 News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: meeting rooms edinburgh </title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52009</link>
		<dc:creator>meeting rooms edinburgh </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-52009</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s your PhD going? I think you&#039;ve touched on a really important topic. I have been using Friendfinder for a while now but not sure it does what it&#039;s supposed to be doing. When you look at facebook or twiiter, usuability was a big design objective. Simple to use,great design interface and traffic generator. FF should needs to rediscover its objective,..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#39;s your PhD going? I think you&#39;ve touched on a really important topic. I have been using Friendfinder for a while now but not sure it does what it&#39;s supposed to be doing. When you look at facebook or twiiter, usuability was a big design objective. Simple to use,great design interface and traffic generator. FF should needs to rediscover its objective,..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singapore Property</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52008</link>
		<dc:creator>Singapore Property</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-52008</guid>
		<description>I agree that profiles of the commenter is needed as this will verifies their credibility.I haven&#039;t use friendfeed before and I shall take that out.Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that profiles of the commenter is needed as this will verifies their credibility.I haven&#39;t use friendfeed before and I shall take that out.Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odzyskiwanie danych</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-52004</link>
		<dc:creator>Odzyskiwanie danych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-52004</guid>
		<description>I understand why people develop those sites - it&#039;s a tested market and they know what to implement. But on the downside everyone&#039;s using Facebook so most of those other social websites are pretty pointless - even if it had a lot better functionality I wouldn&#039;t switch simply because my whole network of friends is on fb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand why people develop those sites &#8211; it&#39;s a tested market and they know what to implement. But on the downside everyone&#39;s using Facebook so most of those other social websites are pretty pointless &#8211; even if it had a lot better functionality I wouldn&#39;t switch simply because my whole network of friends is on fb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prepbooks</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51992</link>
		<dc:creator>prepbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-51992</guid>
		<description>I could relate with your thoughts on friendfeed as I have also been through the hard time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could relate with your thoughts on friendfeed as I have also been through the hard time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51989</link>
		<dc:creator>Quotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-51989</guid>
		<description>Who told you that nobody else needs friendfeed, here I am one of the active users around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who told you that nobody else needs friendfeed, here I am one of the active users around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: utah county auto</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51925</link>
		<dc:creator>utah county auto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-51925</guid>
		<description>My grandfather works in Usability - I think that usability could have a lot to do with it.  I do not think that you should take freindfeed off, it is very useful and people do use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My grandfather works in Usability &#8211; I think that usability could have a lot to do with it.  I do not think that you should take freindfeed off, it is very useful and people do use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Sena</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51914</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Sena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-51914</guid>
		<description>Yep, I agree.  I think FF is only good for early ones..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I agree.  I think FF is only good for early ones..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51869</link>
		<dc:creator>local marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-51869</guid>
		<description>I have a hard time with it being cliquey. That makes it hard to really get a grasp on it and make me want to stay. If I don&#039;t feel comfortable with something I don&#039;t like to stay with it. And that&#039;s how I feel about FF. They need to make more adjustments before it really goes crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a hard time with it being cliquey. That makes it hard to really get a grasp on it and make me want to stay. If I don&#39;t feel comfortable with something I don&#39;t like to stay with it. And that&#39;s how I feel about FF. They need to make more adjustments before it really goes crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51852</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-51852</guid>
		<description>thanks for the link! and you are right - it is cliquey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the link! and you are right &#8211; it is cliquey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warzabidul</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-51840</link>
		<dc:creator>warzabidul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2009/02/08/friendfeed-is-for-early-adopters-why-because-nobody-else-needs-it/#comment-51840</guid>
		<description>Being a tool of early adopters is fine, and in fact is great for community. Personally I like all websites that are for the early adopting masses because it means that those who use it have more time to give to the site. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter is going mainstream and one consequence is that you have thousands of new users but that only use it five minutes a day. As a result there&#039;s a lot of new posts but the interactivity has collapsed as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a tool of early adopters is fine, and in fact is great for community. Personally I like all websites that are for the early adopting masses because it means that those who use it have more time to give to the site. </p>
<p>Twitter is going mainstream and one consequence is that you have thousands of new users but that only use it five minutes a day. As a result there&#39;s a lot of new posts but the interactivity has collapsed as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
