Comments on: We Are Still In the Blogging 1.0 Cycle http://www.lastpodcast.net/2008/06/03/we-are-still-in-the-blogging-10-cycle/ Opinionated Web 2.0 News and Commentary Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:14:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Fred Brunel http://www.lastpodcast.net/2008/06/03/we-are-still-in-the-blogging-10-cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-51476 Fred Brunel Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:43:52 +0000 http://www.lastpodcast.net/2008/06/03/we-are-still-in-the-blogging-10-cycle/#comment-51476 Actually, conversation aggregation might not be that important for content producers but it is for users.<br><br>How many times I've started or participated to a conversation somewhere and forgot about it? There are so many services to talk about a blog post that you can't follow the conversation.<br><br>I think that's the major flaw. Actually, conversation aggregation might not be that important for content producers but it is for users.

How many times I've started or participated to a conversation somewhere and forgot about it? There are so many services to talk about a blog post that you can't follow the conversation.

I think that's the major flaw.

]]> By: Julian Baldwin http://www.lastpodcast.net/2008/06/03/we-are-still-in-the-blogging-10-cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-51475 Julian Baldwin Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:31:02 +0000 http://www.lastpodcast.net/2008/06/03/we-are-still-in-the-blogging-10-cycle/#comment-51475 Your perspectives are sensible and convincing. My first response to this conversation is exactly what you wrote, "whenever you speak in public, or you write something and publish it..." As humans there are certain things we cannot do and one of those is archive all the threads and micro-threads that are connected to an Idea we produced. Aggregating conversations found around the web is not a necessity for content producers, however, I can see the interest in wanting a system that works that way. Maybe this is the natural course of the conversations we hold? Your perspectives are sensible and convincing. My first response to this conversation is exactly what you wrote, “whenever you speak in public, or you write something and publish it…” As humans there are certain things we cannot do and one of those is archive all the threads and micro-threads that are connected to an Idea we produced. Aggregating conversations found around the web is not a necessity for content producers, however, I can see the interest in wanting a system that works that way. Maybe this is the natural course of the conversations we hold?

]]>