Comments on: Confirmed: There are no ads on Twitter

By: Of blogs, accuracy and editors - mathewingram.com/media

Of blogs, accuracy and editors - mathewingram.com/media — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:56:13 +0000

[...] information? I don’t see why not — but I think it should have been updated later, as others have. Nate says that this shows “the importance of journalistic standards, especially that of [...]

By: Of blogs, accuracy and editors - mathewingram.com/work

Of blogs, accuracy and editors - mathewingram.com/work — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:55:53 +0000

By: Frederic

Frederic — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:37:44 +0000

@webomatica – I understand where they are coming from, but this story had no basis – especially after the commenter on the TC story already debunked the screenshot.

@OE – I wish they had one, too. As they grow larger, there cost must be going up, even if their staff is small – and I would like them to stick around for a long time…

By: Ontario Emperor

Ontario Emperor — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:25:26 +0000

Thanks for the update, but frankly I wish that Riley’s original story was correct. I’d feel better if Twitter *was* executing a monetization plan.

By: Webomatica

Webomatica — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:22:08 +0000

In the haste to be first with a story, a tech blogger gets something wrong. Imagine that.

Anyhow it does raise the issue: what web 2.0 services are worth paying for? Eventually, the sites have to pay the bills.

By: » Is Twitter going to Spam Hell? Advertising and spam accounts ahoy! J.T Dabbagian, Content Consultant!: Bloghacking tips and tricks to making a better you…as a blogger, anyway.

Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:10:20 +0000

[...] had it that Twitter was testing advertisements in its streams. This was later proven to be false by Last Podcast, who emailed Biz Stone, head of Twitter, for an [...]

By: Frederic

Frederic — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:36:44 +0000

It’s shocking – I know…

By: Erik

Erik — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:35:22 +0000

Imagine that, Duncan got something wrong…