<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internal linking still sleazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/</link>
	<description>Opinionated Web 2.0 News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Internal linking, ethical or not</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-47797</link>
		<dc:creator>Internal linking, ethical or not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/#comment-47797</guid>
		<description>[...] Internal linking is sleazy    Save this page in: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internal linking is sleazy    Save this page in: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Internal Links: They&#8217;re Bad, Really? Search Engine Optimization Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-47588</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Internal Links: They&#8217;re Bad, Really? Search Engine Optimization Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/#comment-47588</guid>
		<description>[...] (Source) There are good reasons to use internal links (I think the one I used above is a good one), but overall, it is just a sleazy practice meant to do nothing else but keep people on your property. To me, the idea of a link is to send people away and have them come back for more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Source) There are good reasons to use internal links (I think the one I used above is a good one), but overall, it is just a sleazy practice meant to do nothing else but keep people on your property. To me, the idea of a link is to send people away and have them come back for more. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internal Linking Explained &#171; ShortNet</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-47551</link>
		<dc:creator>Internal Linking Explained &#171; ShortNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/#comment-47551</guid>
		<description>[...] Further reading: Internal Linking Still Sleazy The CrunchBase has Taken Over Annoying Internal Linking Trend Sleazy Linkers Lose An Ally Linking: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Further reading: Internal Linking Still Sleazy The CrunchBase has Taken Over Annoying Internal Linking Trend Sleazy Linkers Lose An Ally Linking: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internal Linking Explained</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-47549</link>
		<dc:creator>Internal Linking Explained</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/#comment-47549</guid>
		<description>[...] Further reading: Internal Linking Still Sleazy The CrunchBase has Taken Over Annoying Internal Linking Trend Sleazy Linkers Lose An Ally Linking: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Further reading: Internal Linking Still Sleazy The CrunchBase has Taken Over Annoying Internal Linking Trend Sleazy Linkers Lose An Ally Linking: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePete</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/comment-page-1/#comment-47537</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/10/20/internal-linking-still-sleazy/#comment-47537</guid>
		<description>I thought internal linking helps up your search engine stats.  Also, I check the status bar before I click on anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought internal linking helps up your search engine stats.  Also, I check the status bar before I click on anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
