<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internal/Double Linking is a Bad Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/</link>
	<description>Opinionated Web 2.0 News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Primo Fiorentini</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-51817</link>
		<dc:creator>Primo Fiorentini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/#comment-51817</guid>
		<description>nice article! nice site. you&#039;re in my rss feed now ;-)&lt;br&gt;keep it up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article! nice site. you&#39;re in my rss feed now <img src='http://www.lastpodcast.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />keep it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internal linking still sleazy : The Last Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-47522</link>
		<dc:creator>Internal linking still sleazy : The Last Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/#comment-47522</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote about it about a month ago and I think we are seeing some changes. At least Gawker says it has made some changes (&lt;- yes, that&#8217;s an internal link&#8230;) to make the internal links more transparent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote about it about a month ago and I think we are seeing some changes. At least Gawker says it has made some changes (&lt;- yes, that&#8217;s an internal link&#8230;) to make the internal links more transparent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Data : The Last Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-47280</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Data : The Last Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/#comment-47280</guid>
		<description>[...] most of these links &#8216;false advertising.&#8217; How hard can it be to mark them somehow if Gawker can do it (&lt;- beware, internal link  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most of these links &#8216;false advertising.&#8217; How hard can it be to mark them somehow if Gawker can do it (&lt;- beware, internal link  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backlink Roundup : The Last Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-47004</link>
		<dc:creator>Backlink Roundup : The Last Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/#comment-47004</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments Frederic on Internal/Double Linking is a Bad PracticeFrederic on Internal/Double Linking is a Bad PracticeLouis Gray on Internal/Double Linking is a Bad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments Frederic on Internal/Double Linking is a Bad PracticeFrederic on Internal/Double Linking is a Bad PracticeLouis Gray on Internal/Double Linking is a Bad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-47000</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/#comment-47000</guid>
		<description>Louis - didn&#039;t want to make it sound like I was the first to write about it - I am sure others have been annoyed by this as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis &#8211; didn&#8217;t want to make it sound like I was the first to write about it &#8211; I am sure others have been annoyed by this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-46999</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/#comment-46999</guid>
		<description>Nick, thanks for doing that. I hadn&#039;t noticed it, probably because I tend to read your blogs in Google Reader, where the difference doesn&#039;t show. 

It&#039;s a good first step though, and I have changed the post accordingly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, thanks for doing that. I hadn&#8217;t noticed it, probably because I tend to read your blogs in Google Reader, where the difference doesn&#8217;t show. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good first step though, and I have changed the post accordingly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-46998</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/#comment-46998</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no question my notes weren&#039;t the first on this topic. I&#039;m just glad others have also seen the issue and spoken up. I was tweaked when I saw the Mashable article that literally went nowhere last night - not even to the source of the news (LinkedIn/Obama).

If Gawker Media has had this practice, I&#039;m glad they are listening and making change. Good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no question my notes weren&#8217;t the first on this topic. I&#8217;m just glad others have also seen the issue and spoken up. I was tweaked when I saw the Mashable article that literally went nowhere last night &#8211; not even to the source of the news (LinkedIn/Obama).</p>
<p>If Gawker Media has had this practice, I&#8217;m glad they are listening and making change. Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Denton</title>
		<link>http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-46997</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Denton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastpodcast.net/2007/09/12/internaldouble-linking-is-a-bad-practice/#comment-46997</guid>
		<description>Hey, actually, we have changed the style of internal tag links. They are no longer underlined. So the emphasis is on the external links, but regular readers know they can get background on a name or a product by clicking the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, actually, we have changed the style of internal tag links. They are no longer underlined. So the emphasis is on the external links, but regular readers know they can get background on a name or a product by clicking the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
